Shaken: A Diagnosis on Trial tells the true story of Stephanie Olsa, a suburban wife and mother convicted in 1997 of shaking a neighbor’s baby nearly to death. Shaken interweaves Stephanie’s story, the medical and legal history of SBS, and enough infant physiology to let the reader follow the action.
While I figure out how to publish, I’ve posted the first third of the book outline and a few chapters of different types. The full book proposal is available on request: suelu at ix dot netcom dot com.
1. ”I think she has a touch of the flu”
- The infant Dinah seems to choke and quit breathing in the arms of an adult woman babysitter.
2. ”The most incredible thing has happened to my niece”
- The babysitter, Stephanie Olsa, is accused of shaking the infant.
3. ”California’s nightmare nursery”
- The history of child protection is shockingly short.
4. ”They must have got it wrong”
- The police question Stephanie.
- Child-abuse prosecutor Rob Parrish teaches at an SBS conference that the symptoms of an infant shaking are obvious immediately in all cases.
6. ”My dad will raise whatever it takes”
- Stephanie gets feisty at the county jail.
7. ”They must have found something at the hospital”
- A physician friend of the author’s provides an introduction to infant brain physiology.
8. “Why don’t you tell me everything that happened that day?”
- Stephanie meets her attorney, David Dodge.
9. ”On the theory and practice of shaking infants”
- Pediatric neurosurgeon A. Norman Guthkelch and radiologist John Caffey postulate infant shaking as a mechanism of producing subdural hematoma.
10. ”There would be no interval”
- Dr. Dominic Sanfilippo testifies at the preliminary hearing.
11. ”Whiplash injury and brain damage”
- The SBS research of the 1980s raises more questions than it answers.
12. “I told you not to take that baby back”
- Stephanie’s marriage feels the strain.
13. ”No one would listen”
- The mother of a shaken infant tells how she was turned away twice at the ER over several hours before her son stopped breathing in the waiting room.
14. ”Nobody can believe it”
- Stephanie’s first trial ends in a hung jury; a second trial is scheduled.
15. ”The British nanny, it’s just like my niece”
- The Louise Woodward case bring SBS to national attention.
16. ”It’s really interesting how it works”
- A neonatal intensivist explains run-away cerebral edema.
17. ”It’s possible the emphasized point is inappropriately diversionary”
- The author begins reading the trial transcripts, despairs at the inscrutability of the medical testimony.
18. ”After a variable time, the infant will develop signs of cerebral irritation”
- The author takes an SBS bibliography to the medical library.
And more.
When/where will we be able to find this book?
Excellent question—-I’m working on it. You do know about Audrey Edmunds’s book, right? It doesn’t contain the medical detail, but her story is classic. The first chapter is eerily like the case that brought me into this arena.
Thank you for your interest, and thank you for your own valuable blog.