The model of shaken baby syndrome that has been winning in court for the past 30 years says that only violence can create this distinctive cluster of symptoms inside the skull of an infant:
I use the term “triad only” to mean a diagnosis of infant shaking based on the presence of the triad alone, with no scrapes, bruises, grasp marks, or fractures that might reveal an assault.
At the Eleventh International Conference on Shaken Baby Syndrome, in Atlanta, Georgia, in 2010, I heard a number of speakers say that they never prosecute “triad-only” cases, but my files tell a different story. See, for example, the rubber-band case.
Also beginning in 2010, child abuse experts started characterizing “the triad” as a defense concept that over-simplifies the condition for purposes of courtroom attack. In a keynote speech at the Atlanta conference, for example, Dr. Robert Block, then president-elect of the American Academy of Pediatrics, said:
“Only people who are NOT active physicians working with children, naive journalists, and professors with a biased agenda would propose that only three signs and symptoms support a diagnosis.” – Dr. Robert Block
I have many, many printed examples, however, of statements from organizations like the National Center on Shaken Baby Syndrome articulating the triad as proof of infant shaking. In the Executive Summary published after the Second National Conference on Shaken Baby Syndrome/Abusive Head Trauma in 1998, for example, prosecutor Rob Parrish summarized expert opinion at the time:
Often referred to as the “triad”, consensus continues to be that a collection of (1) damage to the brain, evidenced by severe brain swelling and/or diffuse traumatic axonal injury; (2) bleeding under the membranes which cover the brain, usually subdural and/or subarachnoid bleeding; and, (3) bleeding in the layers of the retina, often accompanied by other ocular damage, when seen in young children or infants, is virtually diagnostic of severe, whiplash shaking of the head. Most presenters agreed that in the absence of a major rollover or side-impact motor vehicle accident, this unique constellation of injuries is not seen in other forms of accidental trauma.
Because it is an especially reputable example, I also quote here from an editorial that ran in 2004 in the British Medical Journal, “Shaken Baby Syndrome: Pathological Diagnosis Rests On the Combined Triad, Not On Individual Injuries” (Harding B., Risdon R.A., Krous H.F., BMJ 2004 328; 720-721):
“In shaken baby syndrome, it is the combined triad of subdural hematoma and retinal haemorrhage with brain damage, as well as the characteristics of each of these components that allow a reconstruction of the mechanism of injury, and assessment of the degree of force employed.”
And in 1998, after the Louise Woodward trial, several dozen child abuse experts signed a letter to the editor of Pediatrics objecting to the credibility given by the media to defense arguments. This quote is from that letter (Chadwick, D.L. et al., “Shaken Baby Syndrome: A Forensic Pediatric Response,” Pediatrics 1998 101(2); 321–3230):
“The shaken baby syndrome (with or without evidence of impact) is now a well-characterized clinical and pathological entity with diagnostic features in severe cases virtually unique to this type of injury—swelling of the brain (cerebral edema) secondary to severe brain injury, bleeding within the head (subdural hemorrhage), and bleeding in the interior linings of the eyes (retinal hemorrhages). Let those who would challenge the specificity of these diagnostic features do so in the peer-reviewed literature, before speculating on other causes in court.”
All of which makes me wonder how Dr. Christopher Greeley can defend his statement in a 2014 editorial denouncing critics of shaking theory that (“‘Shaken Baby Syndrome’ and Forensic Pathology,” Forens Sci Med Path, 2014, 10; 253):
The complex features of AHT are often disparagingly distilling [sic] simply to ‘‘The Triad’’; a term devoid of any real clinical meaning and not used at all in practice.
2015 update: For the stories of two people with enormous community support convicted in the past year based only on the triad, please see “Does the Brain Injury Prove Abuse, or Not?”
If you are not familiar with the debate surrounding shaken baby theory, please see the home page of this site.
copyright 2012 Sue Luttner
Mobile Site | Full Site
Get a free blog at WordPress.com Theme: WordPress Mobile Edition by Alex King.
[…] suspects that an infant has been violently shaken, they must examine the baby for the “triad” of injuries believed to be associated with shaken baby syndrome […]
By Shaken Baby Syndrome Expert and World Renowned Neuropathologist Banned from Practicing Medicine Shaken Baby Syndrome Expert Banned Shaken Baby Syndrome Expert and World Renowned Neuropathologist Banned from Practicing Medicine - Profitable Harm and Medica on November 8, 2025 at 2:53 am
[…] driving force behind the appeal. “The pneumonia was blindingly obvious. But the presence of the triad closed down critical thinking. No one ever questioned the initial diagnosis.” Moran calls the […]
By Dead babies, experts dead wrong, in deadly consensus | Wrongful Convictions Report on October 22, 2021 at 3:37 pm
[…] force behind the appeal. “The pneumonia was blindingly obvious. But the presence of the triad closed down critical thinking. No one ever questioned the initial diagnosis.” Moran calls the […]
By Grace in Exoneration, After 18 Years | On Shaken Baby on October 19, 2021 at 2:11 pm
[…] citing the presence of subdural and retinal hemorrhages, which are two elements of the “triad,” a pattern of bleeding and swelling inside the infant skull that is commonly attributed to […]
By Past the Worst of Their Nightmare, and Trying to Make a Difference | On Shaken Baby on April 10, 2019 at 9:50 pm
[…] said the toddler in her care had choked on a packet of applesauce. Her conviction was based on the triad, with no signs of […]
By Good News, Bad News: the Tragedies Continue | On Shaken Baby on May 6, 2018 at 9:25 pm
[…] case,” Papetti said. “It showed how easily a mistaken diagnosis based on the ‘triad‘ can convict.” By then law professor Deborah Tuerkheimer had published her first […]
By The Forensic Unreliability of the Shaken Baby Syndrome: The Book | On Shaken Baby on March 25, 2018 at 2:03 pm
[…] of Linda, a mother convicted of shaking her third child to death based on the presence of the triad: bleeding in the retinas, bleeding beneath the lining of the brain, and brain swelling. “At […]
By From the heart, from the brain: A top-notch TEDx talk on shaken baby | On Shaken Baby on March 18, 2018 at 11:07 am
[…] outside her expertise. While Justice Mitting recognised that medical specialists evaluating the triad of symptoms for NADI would necessarily be expressing opinions outside their own disciplines, but […]
By 298. Another Medical Martyr, Dr. Wendy Squier (Part Three. The Appeal to the High Court) | Verners Views on December 28, 2017 at 4:53 am
[…] is, the literature supporting the opinion that the presence of the triad proves a child was shaken is “insufficient,” because none of the papers supporting that […]
By Shaken Baby Theory: Poking the Hornet’s Nest | On Shaken Baby on July 9, 2017 at 4:16 pm
[…] state’s motion to drop the case—which was based on the triad with no other findings—referenced three letters written to the prosecutor after the trial from […]
By Shaken Baby Debate: Steps Forward, Steps Backward | On Shaken Baby on March 7, 2017 at 12:34 am
[…] his endorsement of that finding, Justice Mitting recognized that medical specialists evaluating the triad would necessarily be expressing opinions outside their own disciplines, but he still seemed to […]
By Dr. Waney Squier Reinstated | On Shaken Baby on November 7, 2016 at 11:18 pm
[…] shaking theory “weak” and noting that a number of other medical conditions can cause the findings typically used to diagnose shaking […]
By Swedish Review Declares Shaken Baby Theory Unproven | On Shaken Baby on October 28, 2016 at 11:05 am
[…] at last, professionals from around the world, are realizing that not all cases involving the “triad of injuries,” previously thought to be a definite diagnosis of Shaken baby syndrome, are necessarily caused […]
By A Legal Door Opens to Retry All Shaken Baby Syndrome Convictions* | Hwaairfan's Blog on June 15, 2016 at 2:19 pm
[…] suspects that an infant has been violently shaken, they must examine the baby for the “triad” of injuries believed to be associated with shaken baby […]
By Is 'Shaken Baby Syndrome' just a term used to cover up the truth? on April 21, 2016 at 10:02 am
[…] suspects that an infant has been violently shaken, they must examine the baby for the “triad” of injuries believed to be associated with shaken baby syndrome […]
By Shaken Baby Syndrome Expert and World Renowned Neuropathologist Banned from Practicing Medicine | The Liberty Beacon on March 25, 2016 at 4:02 pm
[…] suspects that an infant has been violently shaken, they must examine the baby for the “triad” of injuries believed to be associated with shaken baby syndrome […]
By Shaken Baby Syndrome Expert And World Renowned Neuropathologist Banned From Practicing Medicine | Health Exchange on March 23, 2016 at 3:32 pm
[…] suspects that an infant has been violently shaken, they must examine the baby for the “triad” of injuries believed to be associated with shaken baby syndrome […]
By World Renowned Neuropathologist Has Career Destroyed For Disproving Shaken Baby Syndrome | Health Exchange on March 14, 2016 at 8:46 pm
[…] of shaking their infants so hard that they have caused them to suffer from (SBS), defined by a triad of serious brain injuries that can also be attributed to vaccine adverse […]
By Shaken Baby Syndrome: are parents being blamed for post-vaccination injuries in cruel Big Pharma cover-up? | The Liberty Beacon®™ England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales on January 13, 2016 at 1:34 pm
[…] of shaking their infants so hard that they have caused them to suffer from (SBS), defined by a triad of serious brain injuries that can also be attributed to vaccine adverse […]
By Thirteen Men in One Prison Jailed for “Shaken Baby Syndrome” After Possible Vaccine Injuries had Occurred | The Liberty Beacon on July 17, 2015 at 9:28 am
[…] five years after the experts started saying that they never diagnose shaken baby based on the triad alone. In the widely reported case of Joshua Burns in Michigan, in fact, the diagnosis was based on […]
By Does the Brain Injury Prove Abuse, or Not? | On SBS on July 2, 2015 at 4:15 pm
[…] from the child’s throat during resuscitation and the only physical evidence of abuse was the triad. It seems to me that the world now offers quite a few examples of extensive retinal hemorrhages […]
By Shaking: “A False and Flawed Premise” | On SBS on February 9, 2015 at 12:38 pm
[…] noise and quit breathing. At the hospital, though, doctors said the presence of the triad proved the child had been […]
By Appeals All Over the Map, as Usual | On SBS on May 13, 2014 at 10:31 pm
[…] Chandra Johnson’s first-rate article in The Taos News implies that this was a triad-only case with complicating factors. The child was only three weeks old, and the parents had taken him to […]
By Communication, and Miscommunication, in the Courtroom | On SBS on September 12, 2012 at 12:08 am
[…] MLive coverage implies that this diagnosis is based on the triad alone: The suit alleges that Hurley officials found no outward physical signs of trauma on the […]
By New Cases Exasperate Me | On SBS on July 18, 2012 at 2:06 pm
[…] conviction was way beyond a triad-only case: Not only did the autopsy reveal no abrasions, grip marks, fractures, or other signs of […]
By Arizona Father Freed: Dawn of a Sunnier Era? | On SBS on June 6, 2012 at 8:44 pm